Skip to main content

Introducing Vera, the AI code review agent

AI code review.
Free, forever.

Vera from Axiomstudio AI reviews every pull request on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps Repos. Unlimited reviews and unlimited users, running on the coding agent your team already uses.

Start reviewing free See a sample review
  • No credit card
  • No seat limits
  • No extra LLM subscription
Reviews pull requests on
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Bitbucket
  • Azure DevOps Repos
Runs in
  • Codex
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • Qwen
  • Cursor
Files tickets in
  • Linear
  • Jira
  • ClickUp
  • Inflectra
  • Azure DevOps
  • GitHub Issues

The review gap, in numbers

Code gets written faster. Review hasn't kept up.

Reviews are already slow

15–24 h
is the review time a 2026 benchmark of 8.1 million pull requests from 4,800 teams rates only “fair”. Elite teams finish in under 3 hours. 2026 engineering benchmark, 8.1M pull requests

Slow reviews have real costs

Slowest 25%
of an engineer's diffs tracks their review satisfaction in a large engineering organization's study: the longer those take, the less satisfied they are. Slow reviews also leave code stale and force authors to context switch. Engineering study of code review time, 2022

AI is making it worse

4.6×
longer wait before review starts for AI-generated pull requests, though they are reviewed 2× faster once picked up. 2026 engineering benchmark, 8.1M pull requests

AI is making it worse

32.7%
of AI-generated pull requests are accepted, against 84.4% of manual ones. 2026 engineering benchmark, 8.1M pull requests

AI is making it worse

61%
of 33,596 agent-authored pull requests in GitHub repositories with 100 or more stars had no recorded review activity. Duma et al., EASE 2026
Read why review became the bottleneck

// honest moment

Nobody became a developer to review PRs.

Vera takes the first pass on every one, so your team reviews decisions, not diffs.

Friday, 4:58 PM

+812 lines

“quick one, can you take a look?”

Let Vera take the first pass. Your weekend stays yours.

Review requested · 3 days ago

Still waiting on a review?

Vera's already on it. She picks up every PR the moment it opens.

LGTM

isn't a review.

Vera reads every line.

Nitpicks in review. Bugs in production.

Vera catches what matters. Security, logic, and policy issues first. Style last.

Why code review breaks down

Six reasons pull requests stall, and how Vera helps.

  1. 01

    Time bottlenecks

    Without review help: Reviewers juggle other work, so pull requests sit for hours or days before anyone opens them.

    With Vera: Every pull request gets a first review from Vera, so authors can fix issues before a teammate picks it up.

  2. 02

    The wall of code

    Without review help: Large diffs cause fatigue, and logic or security flaws slip through in the middle of hundreds of changed lines.

    With Vera: Vera reads the whole diff and points to the exact file and line, so reviewers spend attention where it matters.

  3. 03

    Reviewer roulette

    Without review help: Different reviewers apply different standards, and time goes to style debates instead of real bugs.

    With Vera: The same review runs on every pull request, focused on what breaks, whoever picks it up.

  4. 04

    Communication friction

    Without review help: Vague comments like “rewrite this” feel personal, and deadline pressure tempts teams to skip review.

    With Vera: Findings are stated as facts: the trigger, the impact and the evidence. Nothing to take personally.

  5. 05

    Context gaps

    Without review help: Reviewers often don't know the module, the legacy code or the business logic behind the ticket.

    With Vera: Each finding explains what triggers the problem and what it breaks, so someone new to the code can confirm it.

  6. 06

    AI-generated code surge

    Without review help: Coding assistants produce far more code, and each change still needs checking for subtle logic and security errors.

    With Vera: A second agent reviews what the first one wrote, using the coding agent you already have.

The quality journey

Code review is where quality starts.

A review only pays off when the finding gets fixed. Vera reviews the pull request, your coding agent fixes what it found, and Vera checks the fix. In VibeFlow, the same loop continues through security and QA review.

  1. 01

    Review

    Vera reviews the pull request and flags blockers with the trigger, the impact and the evidence.

  2. 02

    Fix

    Your coding agent picks up the findings and pushes the fix to the same pull request.

  3. 03

    Re-check

    Vera re-checks the fix on the same pull request before the work moves on.

  4. 04

    Ship

    In VibeFlow, the same work item also passes Security Lead and QA Lead review before it ships.

See how VibeFlow runs the full loop

A sample Vera finding

Findings you can act on, with the evidence attached.

Each finding names the trigger, explains the impact and shows how Vera verified it, so reviewers can confirm or challenge it in minutes.

High impactBilling

A reload left pending after a Stripe error without a PaymentIntent can block overage indefinitely

billing/handlers/credit_meter_reload.go:98
Trigger
PaymentIntents.New fails without returning a PaymentIntent (timeout, 5xx, detached method), then the saved card changes.
Impact
Every later request reuses the pending operation and keeps getting “payment pending”. A retry under the same idempotency key with a different PaymentMethod is rejected by Stripe. No sweeper expires pending reloads.

Evidence and verification

Evidence
A CreateCreditReload error still returns ErrCreditReloadProviderError without transitioning the pending operation. File unchanged since 17461bd.
Verification
git diff 17461bd..3ee749d on the file plus source reading at head
  1. 01Names the exact trigger

    The failure path, down to the file and line.

  2. 02Explains the impact

    What breaks for customers, and why a retry won't fix it.

  3. 03Shows its evidence

    The code path and the commands used to verify it.

  4. 04Files the ticket

    In Linear, Jira, ClickUp, Inflectra, Azure DevOps or GitHub Issues.

Interact with Vera

Ask for Vera right inside the PR.

Run Vera automatically on every pull request, or call her in with a comment when you want her. Either way she works where your team already talks about the code.

Automatic
Turn on review for every pull request, or comment @vibeflow review always to cover each new push.
On request
Comment @vibeflow review when you want a pass, @vibeflow re-review for a fresh round, or ask Vera a question in the thread.
Guardrails
Repeat reviews stay within a round budget, dismissed advisories are remembered, and summary, configuration and help cost no model run.
Vera comment commands and what each one does
Comment on the PRWhat happens
@vibeflow reviewReview the current revision
@vibeflow review alwaysReview every new push, within the round budget
@vibeflow re-reviewA fresh round on the same revision
@vibeflow ask <question>Ask any question in the PR.
@vibeflow dismiss <reason>In an advisory's thread: dismissed and remembered
summary · configuration · helpFree. No model run

How it works

From repository to reviewed pull request in three steps.

  1. Step 1

    Connect your repository

    Sign up free and connect GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps Repos. Add as many repositories and teammates as you need.

  2. Step 2

    Use the agent you already have

    Vera runs in Codex, Claude, Gemini, Qwen or Cursor. There's no new LLM subscription to buy or approve.

  3. Step 3

    Get reviews and tickets

    Vera reviews every pull request and files follow-up work in Linear, Jira, ClickUp, Inflectra, Azure DevOps or GitHub Issues.

Where Vera fits in VibeFlow

One team, end to end.

Coding agents build each item. Reviewers check it before it ships. Vera is the code review step: when it flags a blocker, the agents fix it on the same pull request and Vera re-checks. Security and QA findings return to the agents the same way. The diagram shows the full VibeFlow platform, which connects to more coding agents, Git hosts and trackers than the Vera integrations listed above.

Why Vera

Full code review coverage, with no seat fees.

Free forever, on all plans
Not a trial or a limited tier. Vera is included free on every Axiomstudio plan.
Unlimited reviews
No caps on pull requests or reviewed lines. Review every change, not only the ones a plan covers.
Unlimited users
Bring the whole team, contractors included. No seat counting.
Bring your own coding agent
Works in Codex, Claude, Gemini, Qwen and Cursor, with no extra LLM subscription or plan.
Works where your code lives
Reviews pull and merge requests on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps Repos.
Files the ticket for you
Direct integrations with Linear, Jira, ClickUp, Inflectra, Azure DevOps and GitHub Issues.

By role

One reviewer for the whole engineering team.

Developers

Feedback before your reviewer sees it

Catch the edge case on your own pull request and merge with fewer review rounds.

Engineering managers

Move the review queue

Give senior engineers time back and turn findings into tickets your team can plan.

AI engineers

A second agent checking the first

Review agent-written code with the coding agent you already run.

CTOs and VPs of Engineering

Review coverage without a seat line item

Roll review out to every team with no per-seat cost and no new LLM contract.

Compare

Vera and typical paid AI code review

Vera compared with typical paid AI code review tools
FeatureVera by AxiomstudioTypical paid tools
PriceFree foreverMonthly fee per developer after a trial
UsersUnlimitedBilled per seat
ReviewsUnlimitedOften capped by pull requests or reviewed lines
Model accessYour existing coding agent: Codex, Claude, Gemini, Qwen, CursorVendor's bundled models, priced into the seat
Git platformsGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps ReposVaries by vendor and plan
TicketingLinear, Jira, ClickUp, Inflectra, Azure DevOps, GitHub IssuesVaries, often on higher tiers

Frequently asked questions

Is Vera really free?

Yes. Vera is free forever on all Axiomstudio plans, with unlimited reviews and unlimited users.

Do I need a separate LLM subscription?

No. Vera works in the coding agent you already use, including Codex, Claude, Gemini, Qwen and Cursor.

Does Vera review every pull request?

Yes, when you turn on automatic review. You can also comment @vibeflow review to ask for a pass, or @vibeflow review always to cover each new push on that pull request.

Which Git platforms are supported?

GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps Repos.

Where do Vera's findings go?

Into the pull request, and as tickets in Linear, Jira, ClickUp, Inflectra, Azure DevOps or GitHub Issues.

What does a Vera finding include?

Each finding names the exact trigger down to the file and line, explains the impact, and shows the evidence and the commands used to verify it.

How does Vera compare with paid AI code review tools?

Vera is free forever with unlimited users and reviews, on your existing coding agent. Typical paid tools charge a monthly fee per developer after a trial and often cap reviews.

How does Vera fit into VibeFlow?

Vera is the code review step. When it flags a blocker, your coding agent fixes it on the same pull request and Vera re-checks. In VibeFlow, the same work item also passes Security Lead and QA Lead review before it ships.

How do I get started?

Sign up at cloud.axiomstudio.ai, connect a repository and open your next pull request.

Put Vera on your next pull request.

Free forever. Unlimited reviews. Unlimited users.

Start reviewing free Request a demo
We use analytics cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.