Your developers are vibe coding.
Here's how you stay compliant.
AI coding agents are writing production code across your org. You didn't approve it. You can't audit it. And when the SOC 2 auditor asks how AI-generated code is reviewed, you don't have a good answer yet.
The problem isn't AI coding.
It's ungoverned AI coding.
These are the questions keeping CISOs up at night. VibeFlow answers every one of them.
"Which AI tools are developers actually using, and what are they doing?"
VibeFlow tracks every agent session, every tool invocation, and every line of code generated. You see which models are in use, what context they receive, and what they produce — across every team.
"Is AI-generated code going through the same review process as human code?"
Security review gates and human-in-the-loop approval ensure AI-generated code is reviewed before it reaches production. No exceptions, no shortcuts, no "I'll review it later."
"If an auditor asks me to demonstrate our AI governance controls, what do I show them?"
Complete audit trails with compliance tagging and exportable evidence. Every agent session, review decision, and code change is logged and mapped to your compliance framework controls.
What your auditor will see
Every AI-generated code change follows a traceable chain from session initiation to compliance tagging.
Agent session initiated
Code generated by AI agent
Security review gate triggered
Human reviewer approves
PR merged to main
Tagged: SOC 2 CC8.1 | Change Management
You don't have to be the one who slows engineering down.
Right now you have two options: block AI coding tools and fight engineering, or allow them and accept the risk.
VibeFlow gives you a third option — govern AI-assisted development with controls that are invisible to developers' workflow but fully visible to your compliance program.
VibeFlow lets the CISO say "yes" instead of "no" or "not yet."
Framework Alignment
VibeFlow maps AI coding governance controls to the frameworks your auditors care about.
| Framework | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Mapped | View mapping → |
| NIST AI RMF | Mapped | View mapping → |
| HIPAA | Mapped | View mapping → |
| ISO 27001 | Mapped | View mapping → |
| EU AI Act | Mapped | View mapping → |
| FedRAMP | Mapped | View mapping → |
How development teams actually use VibeFlow
No new IDE. No workflow disruption. Governance happens in the background.
Works with the tools your team already uses
Invisible to developers, visible to compliance
- Governance happens in the background
- No new IDE or workflow disruption
- Controls enforced at the platform level, not the developer level
- Developers keep their velocity, you keep your compliance posture
Download the AI Coding Governance Checklist
A practical framework for evaluating your org's AI coding governance maturity.
Get the ChecklistSee what your auditor will see
Walk through the audit trail, compliance mapping, and governance controls live.
Request a DemoNeed engineering buy-in? Share the CTO perspective.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Resources
SOC 2 Type II
AI coding controls mapped to SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria.
ComplianceNIST AI RMF
Align AI coding governance with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
CompareVibeFlow vs Devin
See how governed AI coding compares to autonomous agents.
PersonaFor CTOs
Engineering velocity with governance built in.
PersonaFor Compliance / GRC
Audit evidence and compliance mapping for AI-generated code.
ComplianceHIPAA
AI coding governance for HIPAA-regulated healthcare applications.